Date of Dispute: June 2006 Dispute Against: Fortune Affiliates Type of Dispute: Webmaster Dispute Process: Very Good Status of Dispute: Satisfactorily Resolved ========================================= ORIGINALLY RELEASED JUNE 13th 2006: Dear APCW Members, It is our understanding that several affiliates have received rather large payments from Fortune Lounge in connection with the Fortune Buddy issues that were exposed during our audits of Fortune Lounge. We have been told the issues were resolved. We would like to offer a huge congratulations to Fortune Lounge for the resolution of this issue. We realize that it was a complicated and expensive procedure. The fact that Fortune Lounge dedicated several months to investigation and solving this issue speaks volumes for their character. And the fact that they made such large back-payments to their affiliates demonstrates a serious commitment to their partners. We look forward to may happy years of partnership with Fortune Lounge. Thanks to everyone down there, and especially to David S who has had to bear most of the brunt of affiliate frustrations and tough questions. =============================== From Fortune Lounge: Fortune Affiliates is pleased to announce that all affected affiliates have now been awarded their due compensation following the recent cross-branding matter. This brings to completion a complex, three-phase process implemented in March this year to resolve affiliates’ concerns. All players are now being allocated to the relevant accounts in the amended affiliate system, ensuring income generated by an affiliate is fair and accurate. Fortune Affiliates is proud to put affiliates first at all times, as this undertaking with the APCW demonstrates. We will always strive to maintain integrity in our dealings with our affiliates, whose continued support we look forward to. We also hope our affiliates will be incentivised by these steps to an even greater profit margin! Fortune Affiliates

You need to be a member of The APCW to add comments!

Email me when people reply –